IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps: http://ibm.biz/Data-and-AI-Roadmaps

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is: https://hybridcloudunit-internal.ideas.aha.io


ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

pureScale

Showing 49

PureScale high ports statically defined

We require consistent and specific ports to be used for PureScale inter-member communications. It would be ideal if this can be configurable. Currently PureScale requires us to open all high ports >=1024, as per documentation https://www.ibm.co...
almost 4 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Delivered

pureScale port check without pingable IP address in Switch

On AIX, if you are using the old 10GE RoCE adapter without TCP/IP support, RSCT uses port state check to see if the port is alive. With the newer adapters (10GE, 40GE, 100GE, for that matter), all of them supports TCP/IP and the port state check ...
about 4 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Delivered

Request for improving pureScale reliability

In this customer environment, there are 4 power740 systems.
Customer use these 4 systems for high availability DB2 pureScale as,
DB node #1 on p740#1
DB node #2 on p740#2
CF node #1 on p740#3
CF node #2 on p740#4

Recently, power740#...
over 4 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Delivered

pureScale to support Mellanox ConectX-4 IB & RoCE adapters

pureScale can only support Mellanox ConnectX-3 and lower version. More and more customer are using ConnectX-4 and higher version of IB and RoCE adapters, for higher throughput and lower latency, which greatly improves pureScale performance.
over 4 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 2 Delivered

Multiple cross invalidation (XI) connections in RDMA networks on pureScale

High concurrent inserts & selects result in very high CF CPU usage, and CF wait time is lengthened.
over 4 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Delivered

Fix to enable pureScale support with Red Hat KVM on Power

There is a PCI Passthrough issue on Red Hat KVM that would probably not be fixed by Red Hat until V7.4 at the earliest. LTC has proposed an alternative approach to avoid the contention that pureScale is using PCI Passthrough to address.
over 4 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 0 Not under consideration

member subset needs failback functionality without having to configure individual clients

Hello,We have a critical 2-tier application that we are trying to take to pureScale. It has thousands of DB2 clients out in the field which are difficult to configure. We want to affinitize the field clients to go to a certain member of the pure...
about 5 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Delivered

Enable HA/failover functionality at instance level or for groups of databases

DB2 performs failover only at the database level. If a group/set of databases are related, e.g. used for the same application, those databases should ideally failover together, but under the current design, those failovers have to be done individu...
over 5 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 0 Not under consideration

DB2 PureScale for Linux on z

On behalf of several customers, we need to see a PureScale version of DB2 running on Linux on z. Whilst these customers run large DB2 for z/OS estates, they also require HA services for the distributed version used by IBM Products MDM and BPM, oth...
over 5 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 0

pureScale Online node removal

Topic : Moving a DB2 member or a cluster caching facilityURL : https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_10.5.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.admin.sd.doc/doc/t0056896.html?lang=enIt mentions about the procedure :To move the only DB2 member: 1) Stop...
over 5 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Functionality already exists