Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing

Showing 11

Generate UETRs for MX during MSIF sending, not in the MER Data Entry (DNIMX&DNIFINPLUS)

1. For T2 MSGs that we enter in DNIMX domain the field for UETR is not mandatory so we can leave it empty but when we send the MSG from MER to InterAct and to SWIFTNet the UETR is not calculated and field PmtId – UETR is empty even if we put CD co...
almost 3 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 5 Future consideration

FTM to include SWIFTGO Validation

SWIFT Go is a product that is developed by SWIFT, targeted to provide faster, cheaper, more transparent remittance pathway to customers. SWIFT Go has a maximum payment threshold of USD/GBP/EUR 10,000.00. With SWIFT continuous effort to promote the...

Empty Remote DN in MX MSGs with manual entry in MER

We would like a warning MSG to be issued if Remote DN is not Entered in MX MSGs (DNIFINPLUS and DNIMX domains) because the MSG sent to InterAct will get the error in MSG Send Notification.
almost 3 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 1 Future consideration

Automatic generation of field MsgId: Message Identification in MX MSGs when entered manually in MER

Field Field MsgId: Message Identification is mandatory and unique so it should be generated automatically during manual entry of MX MSGs in MER
almost 3 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 2 Future consideration

add indexes in MWH for BICFI from/to in BAH of InterAct messages' payload.

The SWIFT IA services esmig.t2 and ebacl.e1s1 will introduce the "V-Shape" model with the HVPS migration to ISO20022 in Nov 2022, whereas the ESMIG and E1S1 Operators will always be the Requestor or Responder in the IA-header but not the "correspo...

T2 domain in MER Facility for manual entry of T2 MSGs

MER Facility manual data entry for T2 MSGs would be much easier if there was a T2 domain like there is for CBPR+ or remit solutions , Proxy voting MX MSGs This would help data entry users to verify the fields and the whole MSGs according to ECB ru...
over 2 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 0 Not under consideration

Expected FTM-MER NOT to split bank/location or Prefix/Suffix

Expected FTM-MER NOT to split bank/location or Prefix/Suffix. Field 22 - for MT305 / MT600 Field 22C - for MT300, MT320 For example, current MERVA: Party Ref Party PBBEK0 0175 PBBEPX FTM-MER: Party Prefix PBBE Party Suffix K0 Ref 0175 Party Prefix...
about 3 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 1 Not under consideration

Create Shortcut button in MER Msg EDITOR screen

PBB User expecting to have shortcut button to view the next message instead of user have to quit (return to the queue) then only to select the next message in FTM-MER 1) User excepting Next button after opening the message from Message List page 2...
about 3 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 0 Not under consideration

FTM MER Screen – Additional data entry field for Routing

FTM MER Screen - Having an additional data entry filed (something like editable ‘comments’) in the Formatted Tab. The user can enter the comments filed by viewing the details of the Message. This would help in having the custom actions based on th...
about 3 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 1 Not under consideration

FTM-MER should be able to handle this double slash (//) checking

FTM-MER should be able to handle this double slash (//) checking In existing Merva users are required to key in a double slash '//' at the beginning of each account number. In FTM this is not required anymore but since the users are used to keying...
about 3 years ago in FTM for SWIFT Services / Transaction Processing - Validation, Enrichment, Routing 1 Not under consideration