We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive notification on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
Allow references to specific byte ranges within an attribute for comparison. For example, consider building a counter with the intent of identifying a BIN attack/Credit Master attack/enumeration attack. Generally speaking, these attacks will origi...
Create error message or revert back to SS home page when a user is not configured in Guardian.
When a user has SS access, but is not configured in SP, the SP log in screen displays. The user will attempt to log in here and will not be able to continue- this can be very confusing and cause phone calls to our support team. We need either an e...
New AML Type/AML Timestamp field (Duplicate of SP Fraud Type/Timestamp)
A field similar to SP Fraud type/SP Fraud Timestamp is needed for AML marking purposes We have had cases where we would need to mark a transaction as both fraud and an AML type This would have the same function as SP fraud type/timestamp field as ...
Separate the Intercepted by existing rules row within rule generation.
We identified in May that the “Intercepted by existing rules” row within the rule generator does not appear to be functioning correctly. Rather than providing stats surrounding transactions which were intercepted by the model revision, it actually...
Schedule to run a rule over a certain period of time
We are looking for a way within Safer Payments to batch rules over historic transactions. We basically want to schedule to run a rule over a certain period of time. Essentially we are looking for rules that do not trigger as transactions come in, ...
Allow rules to add entries to risk lists with dynamic filter criteria
When an entry is added to a risk list via a rule, filter criteria defined as part of the risk list is static. For example, if an account number is added to a risk list which has filter criteria defined as "Merchant State equal to [Destination Stat...
In attribute field choices, Shift the standard expressions to the bottom of the list
There are standard expressions ( , ValueA ~ValueB, Exp) used in rule writing that are displayed in the field dropdown. These appear first and your customer's field values are last. It should be reversed- field values first, expressions second. E...
Resuming support for duplet detection and not storing identical sequence values
In Safer Payments 6.3.0.01 it seems that duplet detection and the option for not storing identical sequence values for indexes are still not present. In the index create/edit page the "store entries with identical sequence values" checkbox is not ...
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.