Skip to Main Content
IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 84 of 18265

add 'default account name' field for a user to store account used for LSF jobs submission & Licenses.

Hello, in current RTM version (v10.2.0.14), it's not possible to define a default account name (used to submit LSF jobs) per RTM user. Is it possible to add such field in the user record to ease the end-user usage. is it also possible, like for em...
about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 2 Future consideration

RTM Implementation Total GPU Wall time statistic.

RTM GPU Wall time statistic is limited to "only Finished Exclusive job has GPU wall time reported and it based on DCGM".We would like to see statistic for GPU wall time usage regardless job exist status and GPU mode. Also because GPUs are occupied...
over 4 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 2 Not under consideration

Support combination of MIG and DCGM in GPUs with LSF

I got confirmation from dev team. Unfortunately, the combination of MIG and DCGM is not supported yet. So, for now, you cannot get job GPU information if MIG is enabled. You can raise an RFE on this matter so we can keep track of the request.
about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 1 Planned for future release

Ability to limit user's views in RTM to select clusters

Reduces support because users can't flip to other clusters via Cluster drop-down menu to then ask questions about resources and usage or see other information that should only be for users of a particular cluster or why can't they find their infor...
over 3 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 1 Not under consideration

Add IBM LSF RTM alert interval by weekly basis

IBM Spectrum LSF RTM only have hours, daily basis of alert pop-up column could choose. For management of current alert aggregation, We need IBM to add this feature enhancement into RTM fix patch. Add weekly diagram basis of alert. It could sav...
about 4 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 1 Not under consideration

Auto - Associate Business Entity

For the purposes of our product, we only have one main business entity. This is required to be manually associated to every use case. We would like for this to be automated as it is unnecessary to place the burden on the submitter for every submis...
3 months ago in AI Governance 0 Submitted

Radio Buttons vs Dropdown Option

As a system, Watsonx.gov should support the option to have radio buttons for yes/no questions rather than requiring the drop-down format. This would drastically reduce the amount of clicks to complete a questionnaire or a set of fields.
3 months ago in AI Governance 0 Submitted

"Continue" vs "Continue & Close Tab"

Currently, when a pop up or confirmation window appears, the options are "Continue" and "Continue & Close Tab." This is redundant and confusing for submitters. These options should be customizable or able to be streamlined into one option is a...
3 months ago in AI Governance 0 Submitted

Workflow Lifecycle View for Submitters

As a submitter, I should be able to view an interactive lifecycle view of the workflow where I can see how many steps I have completed, what task I am in, any sub tasks/approvals, and how much of the lifecycle is left to remail. This should be ava...
3 months ago in AI Governance 0 Submitted

Task View: Customization

The Task view should allow for customization of the Chart at the top and the columns included in the chart. Different enterprises have different variables that may be most important to those performing the tasks.
3 months ago in AI Governance 0 Submitted