IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

FTM Common Services

Showing 36

Recipient name match score needs to be exposed.

With FTM 3.2.9.1 , from logs , I see that, EWS provides Recipient name match score in ValidateRecipientResponse . Example : <ns4:first-name-match-score>49</ns4:first-name-match-score><ns4:last-name-match-score>15</ns4:last-nam...
over 2 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Not under consideration

Enhance MT to MX Mappers to Support Additional ISO Payment Schemes

The existing MT to MX translation correctly translates MT to CBPR+ messages. However, not all ISO schemes have the same fields as CBPR+. The existing MT to MX implementation will not create a syntactically correct Target2 message. The following pa...
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Not under consideration

Enhance MT Outbound Post Mapper to Support Changing of MT Field Values

The current MT Outbound Post Mapper already has the MT message converted to a blob and so there is no easy way to change an MT field value. The MT Post Mapper should work more like the ISO Post Mappers in the sense that the Post Mapper can add, de...
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Not under consideration

Support Mapping PACS.008 Group Header Control Sum Field

Enhance the product PACS.008 inbound and outbound mapper to support the mapping of ISO200222's generic PACS.008 /Document/FIToFICstmrCdtTrf/GrpHdr/CtrlSum field. Ideally, all generic group header fields would be supported.
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Not under consideration

Add Addenda columns to the Gateway CSV files

Please add the following 2 columns to the Gateway CSV timing files: 1) # of Addenda records processed2) Sum of Items and Addenda processed
over 5 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 2 Not under consideration

Sender’s rolling 30-day limit information in the payment flow

Can Sender’s rolling 30-day limit information be exposed in the cxcpayment object , so that it can be used in the fraud detection user exit and thereby supplied to fraud analytics team . Currently , there is no straightforward way to retrieve this...
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 1 Not under consideration

Business Rules Server's "Distribution Done" message should include success/failure information

In support case TS007497792 (RTP-1184 PERF Gateway Server 1Q1 has not been processing any transactions), we had a problem resulting from failures in the workflow activation for one of our 4 gateway servers. Because we scanned for the final message...
almost 3 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 3 Not under consideration

FTM IP Process Steps Have User Exit Enabling "Routing Ticket" on Per Message Basis

Background The current FTM Immediate Payments products of TCH, SCT and HVP allow a bank to customize the Services called at each workflow step (e.g. PreCheck, PreSubmit, PostAccept, etc). The limitation is the customization is limited to a payment...
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Not under consideration

Exposure Limit Monitor Start/End Date should allow for year to be specified

On the Partner Details screen, Risk Management/Exposure Limit Monitors- you can specify an Effective Begin Date (MM/dd) and an Effective End Date (MM/dd) but you cannot specify the year. In principle, the idea of having the ability to have monitor...
almost 5 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Not under consideration

Migration of the database tables to be completed in less than 2 hours

As per the TCH mandates that are coming on April 1st, the installation and migration with any new release needs to be < 4 hours. While the deployment scripts can be parallelized to gain efficiency and be completed in <2 hours, the DB migrati...
over 2 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.