Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps: http://ibm.biz/Data-and-AI-Roadmaps

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is: https://hybridcloudunit-internal.ideas.aha.io


ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 111

Provide doublet detection at the message type level, not just at the mandator level

The feature would allow doublets to have different configurations based on the type of message being processed. It would remove complexities of having to develop doublet detections across a wide variety of message types. It would reduce chance of ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Multiple Mandator Ownership

During Safer Payments implementation some issues were raised regarding the form SP relates the transaction messages with mandators. In the mandator structure there needs to have Issuers and Acquirers. Most of transactions belong to two mandators, ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Future consideration

Cluster simulation workload distribuition

Distribute the simulation load on other cluster available instances, and not just the one serving API
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Under review

Allow functionality to navigate left/right in a data table using keyboard keys, specifically in the case selection page.

Currently in 5.7 you can navigate up/down/left/right in any data table using the keyboard keys however in 6.3 you can only up/down on the overall page with the keyboard, you cannot up/down/left/right in a table result. The main place we would like...
about 2 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Element to Element Compare using substrings

Allow references to specific byte ranges within an attribute for comparison. For example, consider building a counter with the intent of identifying a BIN attack/Credit Master attack/enumeration attack. Generally speaking, these attacks will origi...
7 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

User Preference settings for Case Management set up

Have one control setting for user preferences on how they want Investigation cases to look. It seems I have to set my column and field preferences for each queue. SP should have one control setting for cases.
8 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Submitted

Create error message or revert back to SS home page when a user is not configured in Guardian.

When a user has SS access, but is not configured in SP, the SP log in screen displays. The user will attempt to log in here and will not be able to continue- this can be very confusing and cause phone calls to our support team. We need either an e...
10 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

New AML Type/AML Timestamp field (Duplicate of SP Fraud Type/Timestamp)

A field similar to SP Fraud type/SP Fraud Timestamp is needed for AML marking purposes We have had cases where we would need to mark a transaction as both fraud and an AML type This would have the same function as SP fraud type/timestamp field as ...
10 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Force the system to register specific characters as normal text

Characters which provide specific function within Safer Payments such as (),{},~,*,? cannot be interpreted as plain text for rule writing. Merchant names, for example, may enter the system with these characters.
11 months ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Allow for the reference of Rule Name, Rule UID, and Rule Comment within a conclusion

Would like the ability to reference the Rule Name, Rule UID, or Rule Comment within a conclusion. For rule auditing, we may assign unique values to an overwritable input on a rule by rule basis. Safer Payments already inherently assigns a Unique V...
11 months ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted