IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps: http://ibm.biz/Data-and-AI-Roadmaps

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is: https://hybridcloudunit-internal.ideas.aha.io


ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

Spectrum LSF

Showing 371

INQUEUE PREEMPTION

Because "Preemption scheduling" is actually for the jobs in different queues.LSF today has no such feature or concept of in-queue preemption. the new feature maybe work like this:define a INQUEUE_PREEMPT=[[userA,80%] [userB,20%]] ...For example, ...
almost 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration 1 Future consideration

RC_Account visibility in RTM Job Info fields

IBM LSF Resource Connector has gone through many enhancements, like job level RC_Account. However, this field is not visible in RTM. This new filed should be added in RTM job information.
about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM / Cloud Bursting 3 Future consideration

Add support to Kerberos ticket with new "renew-until" date for already submitted jobs

While using Kerberos ticket forwarding on a LSF cluster: Currently TGT found on the submission host is copied to LSF cache and forwarded to the execution host at job submission; These tickets can be renewed automatically by LSF until the TGT "rene...
about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 3 Future consideration

License Scheduler ENABLE_DYNAMIC_RUSAGE + FAST_DISPATCH combination

We are troubled by the slow dispatch time of jobs, when the license scheduler is involved. Even after lengthy optimization, the dispatch time remains at 10-25 seconds, which is not good. (note that LMSTAT time and interval is just 3 seconds).If th...
about 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / License Management 0 Future consideration

bswitch does not with limits in lsb.resources

We have defined some limits per queue under lsb.resources due to which bswitch command does not work even for commands which do not require resources mentioned in lsb.resources.
almost 5 years ago in Spectrum LSF 4 Not under consideration

License token distribution without share based calculation by LSF License Scheduler

In License Scheduler it is mandatory to configure Project mode or Cluster mode and specify the shares for all the defined Features.However, some license tokens are not tied to any project or cluster and should be distributed freely, without any fa...
about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / License Management 1 Planned for future release

Enable override of -u flag to docker in LSF

The docker LSF integration would be more useful if the user inside the container was not forced to be LSB_SUB_USER. It's not clear where this -u flag is being added to the docker command by LSF. The construction of this flag does not appear to be ...
almost 3 years ago in Spectrum LSF 1 Not under consideration

LSF Explorer support for multiple clusters with the same name

Customer has multiple clusters with the same cluster name.Changing LSF cluster names to be unique is not an option.Their environment is large.Other products in the LSF family support this.LSF_LIC_SCHED_CLUSTER_ALIAS addresses the concern for Licen...
over 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Reporting/Explorer 0 Future consideration

Job slot of suspended jobs should be used in pending jobs

Hi Team,I would like pending jobs to be executed on the slots, where jobs are suspended using bstop command.Currently its not happening and those suspended job slots are remains unused. I request you to have a look and fix this issues in future r...
over 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 1 Future consideration

Increase MAX_JOBID in PE environment - 4194303 too low

When using PE in LSF the maximum job ID is 4194303.We have already cycled through the range in 12 months and we'll likely do it twice this year.Having jobs with duplicate IDs causes a lot of problems with things like job accounting.
about 5 years ago in Spectrum LSF 1 Not under consideration