IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps: http://ibm.biz/Data-and-AI-Roadmaps

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is: https://hybridcloudunit-internal.ideas.aha.io


ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

Spectrum LSF

Showing 798

Have the gridalarms plugin respect Maintenance Schedules like it parent plugin thold does

The gridalarms Cacti plugin was initially a fork of the thold plugin which supports the concept of a Maintenance Schedules, but this functionality was never implemented in gridalarms. We would like to see if that functionality can be added to gri...
about 2 months ago in Spectrum LSF 1 Future consideration

Enhance database_purge_cluster.php to have an 'all' option

This --clusterid=all would remove any clusters not currently found in the grid_clusters table. So, the deletes would look something like: DELETE FROM some_table WHERE clusterid NOT IN (SELECT clusterid FROM grid_clusters) Also, the help on this...
about 2 months ago in Spectrum LSF 0 Future consideration

Deprecate License Scheduler DYNAMIC setting and support RUSAGE DURATION natively

Currently License Scheduler does not support jobs that use a DURATION on a license reservation in either Fast Dispatch or Cluster Mode. We would prefer that License Scheduler follow LSF properly in all three modes, and deprecate/remove the DYNAMI...
about 2 months ago in Spectrum LSF 0 Future consideration

Improve Host Automation in RTM to Move a Host that is Moved from Cluster to Cluster

Today, in our operations, we will move a host from cluster to cluster and in RTM that means that there will now be multiple hosts with the same hostname associated with multiple clusters. What we would prefer is that instead of creating a new hos...
about 2 months ago in Spectrum LSF 0 Future consideration

Simplify the Removal of a specific select string or rusage from a running or pending job

It would be nice if we simply had the ability to bmod away a reservation without having to reconstruct the entirety of the bsub -R "blah" syntax. I would much prefer to do something like: bmod --remove-reservation mylicense [options] jobid ... ...
about 2 months ago in Spectrum LSF 0 Future consideration

Normalize and Remove SELECT "OR" clause in Effective Reservation Requirements

When a job that is pending for a -R "select[this || that]" should be normalized to either select[this] or select[that] upon dispatch so that the user can tell what set of requirements were used to dispatch the job, but this is not currently the be...
about 2 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0 Future consideration

When submitting a job to a CGROUPv2 Compatible System Modify cpu.shares based upon the task count requested by the job

LSF would support CGROUPv2 better, if it adjusted the number of CPU shares for a job based upon the number of cpus/tasks requested by the job.
3 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 2 Future consideration

File Transfers for Large Files are Unreliable with /tmp folder too small

2020-02-18: PSA should log an RFE to provide a setting in pmc.conf to allow the Application Center administrator to define a 'scratch' directory other than /tmp.Also we don't understand why we can not submit a job with template cmd when the /tmp i...
almost 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF 1 Delivered

One mbatchd connect to two blds (License Scheduler)

In our company, each business unit is using its own lsf cluster and license scheduler.We are going to have a company wide license server for a license feature A and every business units will share the license.Is there a way for a LSF cluster to po...
about 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF 1 Not under consideration

LSF Explorer flexusage data collection from remote (EU) data collector to (US)Explorer server signficantly lags

A data collection host in Europe takes more than 5 minutes to send data collected in past 5 minutes to ES located in US and cause data lagging. Expect to enhance the data transferring between continentals
over 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Reporting/Explorer 0 Planned for future release