IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Spectrum LSF

    Showing 91

    Enhancement request to lsfproxyd

    We have workfloads from dozen of users which continously generating very high and sustained job submission requests. Whenever they are starting their work, the grid may grind down to a halt or very slow to process any other request. We want a tier...
    about 2 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Other 1 Future consideration

    Composite License Packaging for Simplified Allocation

    Introduce a capability in IBM LSF License Scheduler to define a single package name that represents multiple license features. When this package is allocated, all underlying licenses are automatically allocated together. This would be similar to h...
    2 months ago in Spectrum LSF / License Management 1 Future consideration

    improvement on guaranteed pool type for GPU resources

    In our CMCC HPC data center using LSF scheduler as the batch queueing system, we configured different guaranteed pools in order to handle different needs of the users using the Service Class system.The guaranteed pools implemented use both hosts a...
    3 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Other 1 Future consideration

    Allow for blocklist for lsfproxyd to persist through reboots.

    When lsfproxyd restarts, the block list is removed. If the block list was not dumped before or accidentally restarted the lsfproxyd daemon, blocked trouble users can cause problems in the cluster again.
    3 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 0 Future consideration

    Update calculation for "Total CPUs" field in RTMweb grid_clusterdb.php to sum of cores*nprocs from sum of maxCPUs

    Need to see the total number of CPU cores aggregation correctly.
    4 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 1 Future consideration

    Update the Open Source CLI commands package

    Having this makes it easier to build interfaces to the data.
    5 months ago in Spectrum LSF / End User UI/Applicaton Center 0 Future consideration

    allow bresize request on job using affinity string.

    due to AMD Zen arch processor, we plan to use affinity string for all jobs to force job processes to run into the smallest number of ccd, to improve performance. but bresize increase command refuse to work when an affinity string is present in the...
    5 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 1 Future consideration

    Feasibility to kill the jobs if they are submitted directly in the remote cluster for multi cluster scenario

    We can see remote cluster jobs with "bjobs -m <clustername> ..." from another cluster that is a member of MC, no matter the jobs are forwarded to remote cluster or submitted directly in the remote cluster, but we cannot kill the jobs if they...
    6 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Cloud Bursting 1 Future consideration

    Queue level cgroup enablement

    Hi - we have a large cluster that services many different types of workloads. To better "bucket" these workloads, we have queues set up with rules that define how the jobs must run (or be submitted). One problem we have is that some of the workloa...
    6 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration 2 Future consideration

    Limit Priority Over Time and Max User Priority by Queue

    There are user workflows that require using priority to order flows and their execution. However, when priority over time is enabled, those methods break down. Using Priority Over Time to APS and Priority Queues is essential, but causes issues in ...
    7 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0 Future consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.