IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 615 of 18234

    bsub should accept a cpu_efficiency parameter to allow cpu over-commiting in the pool

    It's rare for a job to achieve close to 100% cpu efficiency. Often, jobs have a peak cpu requirement during its execution lifetime but use less cpus in average. If bsub could be told that a job is expected to run with a given cpu efficiency, LSF c...
    over 3 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Simulation & Prediction 2 Not under consideration

    Allow Flagging Jobs for Reservation Through Rules and/or Through a "bsub --plan" Option

    Today, reservations in LSF are handled by the Top X jobs by ordered by Dynamic Priority using the variable MAX_JOB_RESERVE. We believe that this is a shotgun approach. We have millions of jobs a day that require 1 cores and less than 1GB of memory...
    over 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration 0 Future consideration

    let "-gpu" support "||"

    This allows more than one gmodel to be chosen when submitting a job. So it is a useful feature.
    10 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 1 Functionality already exists

    Change job submit time to include milliseconds for precision.

    Job submit time to include milliseconds for precision. Instead of HH:MM:SS, make it like 12:29:05.1234. This will enable this column to be used as a unique identifier when generating data in an incremental fashion. We are extracting the RTM data a...
    over 3 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Reporting/Explorer 4 Not under consideration

    Ability to limit user's views in RTM to select clusters

    Reduces support because users can't flip to other clusters via Cluster drop-down menu to then ask questions about resources and usage or see other information that should only be for users of a particular cluster or why can't they find their infor...
    over 3 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM 1 Not under consideration

    Implement Kerberos Constrained Delegation for LSF

    currently LSF uses kerberos API "krb5_cc_retrieve_cred" to retrieve user TGT, details can be found:http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-latest/doc/appdev/refs/api/krb5_cc_retrieve_cred.html this API doesn't work for TGT created by constrained delegati...
    over 4 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration 1 Not under consideration

    Ensure that 'bresize' calls ESUB so that we can do policy enforcement, like limit the increase to no more than X tasks or to keep the job from going over Y tasks

    Once we re-certify Session Scheduler, we know that the users will 'game the system'.
    over 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration 0 Future consideration

    Support for Python3.8 with IBM LSF Python API

    Support for Python3.8 with IBM LSF Python API
    almost 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Installation 2 Functionality already exists

    LSF to control SSH sessions on hosts running LSF jobs

    We have many users who need to open an SSH session from their IDE ( VSCode, PyCharm) to a cluster machine running their LSF job so they can debug/troubleshoot/test in realtime in an interactive session. While battach works to connect to a cluster ...
    over 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 3 Future consideration

    Do not start jobs with less than X cores per host

    It is useful for when ptiles or slots do not fulfill your needs. Using an example, we have an MPI code that requests 100 cores. We don't tell LSF how to grab those cores, and sometimes it will go out and span across 12 nodes, taking 19 cores on on...
    11 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0 Future consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.