IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 326 of 18244

    Allow tooling users to be able to save queries inside of tooling

    When iterating in Discovery, especially when experimenting with multiple and more complex queries it would be very useful to be able to save my query once I have it in suitable shape so I can iterate on another one without losing my work.
    over 8 years ago in Watson Discovery 1 Not under consideration

    pureScale Online node removal

    Topic : Moving a DB2 member or a cluster caching facilityURL : https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_10.5.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.admin.sd.doc/doc/t0056896.html?lang=en It mentions about the procedure :To move the only DB2 member: 1) Stop t...
    over 9 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Functionality already exists

    Eliminate the restriction of IB and RoCE mixture for db2iupdt in pureScale

    We are promoting the Technical Partnership with Huawei in China, and make more customer use DB2 database with Huawei Hardware (FusionServer as High performance computer, and FusionCube as the use-as-box-open). In typical DB2 pureScale configuratio...
    almost 10 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Not under consideration

    pureScale tiebreaker "independent of SAN" used

    State Farm would like the tiebreaker disk to be completely independent of what type of SAN is being used" Rob Lemeuix
    over 10 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 0 Not under consideration

    Online remove member

    Request to support online member removal from pureScale
    over 10 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 0 Future consideration

    SQLTIMEOUT during FileNet CM metadata creation operations

    A SQL_TIMEOUT is experienced when executing multiple SQL statements in a pureScale environment. This does not happen in a non-pureScale environment and when pureScale is configured with only 1 active node. The PMR mentioned has a multitude of data...
    over 10 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Not under consideration

    HA for DB2/DPF using disk replication

    Many challenges with node recovery. Current BP is to reboot all nodes in the cluster if any one fails. Many cases where db2 agent hangs on restart and requires a node reboot. Would prefer to see disk replication used for HA
    about 11 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 0 Not under consideration

    Regulation of the transport objects by data source per pureScale cluster within the JVM.

    This requirement was raised in the old IBM requirement system in 2011. The requirement id was R2PRO00006740. The connection from JVM(WebSphere) connection pool- JCC driver - Global transport pool into the agent of UDB pure scale. The requirement i...
    about 11 years ago in Db2 / pureScale 1 Not under consideration

    Introduce fine-grained access control in Watson Discovery to restrict document visibility based on user permissions.

    Watson Discovery currently lacks the ability to enforce document-level access restrictions, which limits its suitability for multi-user or multi-tenant environments where data privacy is critical. In its current form, all users with access to a Di...
    2 months ago in Watson Discovery 0 Submitted

    Make sentence limitation optional

    Right now, period + whitespace terminate a sentence and makes it impossible to set relations. A ml-models performance is lowered significantly by the inconsistency of documents that one is using it one, for instance e-mails. Including workarounds...
    over 6 years ago in Watson Discovery 0 Not under consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.