IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 103 of 18257

    Integration of Instana monitoring

    Hi, Instana is an IBM application monitoring product. Is an integration a future evolution of SP possible ? Regards Yvon
    almost 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Not under consideration

    Digital cards and deletion of tokens

    The requirements described in additional details are alternatives, only one should be implemented depending on the effort and the planned delivery date. The customer would like to decide on one of the solutions together with IBM.
    almost 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Future consideration

    To support the creation of a Db2 range-partitioned target table if the source table is a Db2 range-partitioned table and the target table does not exist when creating a Q Subscription.

    According to the current design, when the target table does not exist, Q Replication can automatically create the target table based on the source table schema when creating a Q Subscription. However, Q Replication always creates a normal table, r...
    12 months ago in Data Replication: Q-Replication & Availability / Replication for Availability (LUW, Db2 Warehouse) 0 Future consideration

    Increase the Max Index Size Allowed

    This would allow the system to continue scaling without having to design a new process utilizing the existing indexes.
    12 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Under review

    Support Standard Scalar and Higher Percision for PMML Imported Models

    Increasing the capabilities of what is supported from PMML models will allow for more tools to be used when creating external models. This would be a functionality improvement for all customers that utilize the PMML functionality. Several of the p...
    about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Planned for future release

    In case of wrongly formatted Ipv4

    When a message send with Ipv4 elemnt where the context of it doesn't fulfill the requirement of Ipv4 format, there is no SP response sent back to the source. Instead they get to see only “Error: socket hang up”. It would be perfect if SP would be ...
    about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Under review

    For tables w/ columns that are generated by default, update the internal sequence with the next value for the column

    When using Qrep for DR , we have to make the target table which has generated numeric values to be generated by default. That is understood. In a DR scenario, when we fail over from the A to the B side, we have to run a script that gets the max va...
    about 1 year ago in Data Replication: Q-Replication & Availability / Replication for Availability (LUW, Db2 Warehouse) 0 Future consideration

    Q Capture/Db2 LUW: Replicate DROP COLUMN-operations

    If the source table of an active subscription is altered by a DROP COLUMN operation, there is high risk of continuous data corruption on that table due to incorrect reading of Db2's transaction log entries from that time on. The current workaround...
    about 2 years ago in Data Replication: Q-Replication & Availability / Replication for Availability (LUW, Db2 Warehouse) 0 Not under consideration

    Requesting Q-Replication capability from Non-Temporal to Temporal Table

    This RFE/Idea is to request Q-Replication capability from Non-Temporal source to Temporal Table target. The existing Q-Replication only supports from Temporal to Temporal tables. For reporting within FTM (Financial Transaction Manager), there is a...
    over 5 years ago in Data Replication: Q-Replication & Availability / Replication for Availability (LUW, Db2 Warehouse) 2 Planned for future release

    Separate node for running ML algorithms

    Running ML training on production cluster is pretty challenging. Most often this leads to system crash. The idea is to have a special hardware or VM node that is added to the Safer Payments cluster, but this node to has specific role for only runn...
    over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 1 Submitted

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.