IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 135

Increased functionality of the "Close to" and "Not Close to" operators

When using the "close to" operators in a condition, would like the ability to specify whether or not the tolerance is only positive or only negative, in addition to the current setting which always works in both a positive and negative direction.
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Safer Payments & http protocol

Safer Payments server stops responding when sending requests with HTTP header "Transfer-encoding: chunked" Use case Sample: curl -k \ -X POST https://safer-payments.uat.feci.geci:37911/ \ -H "X-SP-Protocol-Version: 1" \ -H "Accept: application/jso...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Not under consideration

Allow rules to add entries to risk lists with dynamic filter criteria

When an entry is added to a risk list via a rule, filter criteria defined as part of the risk list is static. For example, if an account number is added to a risk list which has filter criteria defined as "Merchant State equal to [Destination Stat...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Automatic transfer of parametrizations and new versions

Currently, all parametrizations, made in test environment, have to be transferred manually to production (the parametrization has to be repeated). The same is for version transfers. We would like to have a process for automatic transfer. The requi...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Future consideration

Create error message or revert back to SS home page when a user is not configured in Guardian.

When a user has SS access, but is not configured in SP, the SP log in screen displays. The user will attempt to log in here and will not be able to continue- this can be very confusing and cause phone calls to our support team. We need either an e...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Force the system to register specific characters as normal text

Characters which provide specific function within Safer Payments such as (),{},~,*,? cannot be interpreted as plain text for rule writing. Merchant names, for example, may enter the system with these characters.
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Allow for the reference of Rule Name, Rule UID, and Rule Comment within a conclusion

Would like the ability to reference the Rule Name, Rule UID, or Rule Comment within a conclusion. For rule auditing, we may assign unique values to an overwritable input on a rule by rule basis. Safer Payments already inherently assigns a Unique V...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Automatic reconciliation of references when an attribute is deleted

When an attribute needs to be deleted, the UI will throw an error advising of any references to said attribute. There could be multiple queries, rules, or other model components using a particular attribute, resulting in dozens or even hundreds of...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Separate Mandater/user privileges for Intercept vs Monitoring models/rules

Providing access to Model writing provides access to both intercept or case creation models. Would like these unlinked.
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Functionality already exists

Separate mandator/user privileges for Rule Generation and Simulation

Simulation and Generation are tied together, if you can access one you get the other. Would like these unlinked.
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.