IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Enhance the Gateway Java API to include the ability to get and use a database connection in user exits

    Publish a supported Java API that a customer implemented Gateway User Exits can get a database connection from. The database connection should be based upon the same database credentials as what the Gateway uses. The database connection should be ...
    11 months ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 2 Submitted

    fff

    fff
    7 months ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Fedwire 1 Not under consideration

    FTM4SS - MER - Validation of Interact application header

    Hello,regarding the creation of XML messages on the FTM4SS - MER (version 3.2.4.13), the application appears to validate the messages even if the user does not insert the Message References of the message in the InterAct Header sections (see attac...
    almost 2 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift CBPRPlus 0 Under review

    Would like Business rules to not allow a second click of the activate button or a flag be set that activation has started and not allow other attempts to activate again until it is complete.

    A release was accidently activated twice within 2 minutes, while Business Rules was tied up, it kept inbound files from processing. This caused files to go into error in inbound physical transmissions. Files were able to be successfully restarted ...
    about 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Under review

    FTM DB and Datasharing recommendation

    Business continuity, High Availability, Scalability, and Performance lead the decision to go with a multi-instance topology, running more than one Financial Transaction Manager instance two or more logical partitions, sharing the same FTM Database...
    over 7 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Base 0 Not under consideration

    Generate UETRs for MX during MSIF sending, not in the MER Data Entry (DNIMX&DNIFINPLUS)

    1. For T2 MSGs that we enter in DNIMX domain the field for UETR is not mandatory so we can leave it empty but when we send the MSG from MER to InterAct and to SWIFTNet the UETR is not calculated and field PmtId – UETR is empty even if we put CD co...
    over 5 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 5 Future consideration

    Empty Remote DN in MX MSGs with manual entry in MER

    We would like a warning MSG to be issued if Remote DN is not Entered in MX MSGs (DNIFINPLUS and DNIMX domains) because the MSG sent to InterAct will get the error in MSG Send Notification.
    over 5 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 1 Future consideration

    Automatic generation of field MsgId: Message Identification in MX MSGs when entered manually in MER

    Field Field MsgId: Message Identification is mandatory and unique so it should be generated automatically during manual entry of MX MSGs in MER
    over 5 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 2 Future consideration

    We would like to have FTM in High Availability

    In an HA environment with 2 FTM SWIFT nodes there is a restriction to have a single copy of the FTM SWIFT code in a shared library /usr/lpp/IBM/ftmswift/v300, visible from both LPARs
    over 7 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 0 Not under consideration

    Visible Owner ID of message on OAC screen

    we don't have visible owner ID when viewing the message, it is important to find out to which user group it belongs to
    over 3 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Base 0 Not under consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.