Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps:

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is:



Information Server - Governance

Showing 482

Ability to run lineage at Term Level

We have a business requirement to view the Lineage Graph of a Term in IGC Glossary.However, we know that currently its not possible to run lineage on terms or categoriesWhat would be the best way to therefore show lineage for a term in IGC
over 1 year ago in Information Server - Governance 2 Future consideration


The Labs (development team) confirmed that only FROM . or FROM could be parsed for the SQL embedded in an ODBC Connector. The request for FROM .. is an Enhancement Request.
over 1 year ago in Information Server - Governance 1 Future consideration

Informatica lineage parsing beyond limitation(5 layers) in WKC

Customer couldn't see the column name under the transformation in lineage. and created PMR TS006637652 Got the following feedback : The Open IGC bridge does not support feature level lineage. There is transformation level only lineage. This is rel...
8 months ago in Information Server - Governance 0 Not under consideration

Increase Hierarchy view List length

We have more then 100 (the current view limit) asset in several of our assets types. When we try to use the Hierarchy View, the lists cut off and the assets below the cut off are not able to be expanded or viewed in their hierarchy format, which i...
4 months ago in Information Server - Governance 1 Not under consideration

Option to download in DQEC the exception set

We have business case to download exception set (csv or excel), from Data Quality Exception Console.
almost 3 years ago in Information Server - Governance 0 Not under consideration

new view for a XMETA table

Hello, please develop new views (in XMETA or CMVIEWS database schema) for the following XMETA tables:ASCLMODELPHYSICALMODEL (exposing at least the following columns NAME_XMETA, xmeta_repos_object_id_xmeta, namespace_xmeta) and INSIGHTAPPLICATINSTT...
over 1 year ago in Information Server - Governance 1 Planned for future release

see information asset assignment trackable in workflow

According to guidance from Case TS001770322, assigning an information resource asset to an already published term does not initiate the workflow process.We need ALL change made in one term to start the workflow process as this results in a data go...
over 1 year ago in Information Server - Governance 1 Planned for future release

Lineage support for File connector wildcard

Due to performance reasons, File connector reading Hadoop source must use wild card *. It is necessary ti support this use with IGC lineage. As data lineage results broken.
over 1 year ago in Information Server - Governance 1 Planned for future release

Default Constraint name and value are not imported by IGC

We are trying to import an ERwin model into IGC and we are not able to see any of the default Constraint name and value imported by IGC. A case (TS000889408) has already been raised with IBM support and they suggested to raise an RFE for this.
over 1 year ago in Information Server - Governance 1 Future consideration SSO did not work for IGC and Enterprise Search

After login into igc, and then you visit enterprise search, you need to login again. The sso seems did not work for IGC and enterprise search. For more details. please see the attached document. PMR number: TS003689653
over 1 year ago in Information Server - Governance 1 Is a defect