Skip to Main Content
IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



Status Submitted
Workspace Cloud Pak for Data
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 15, 2026

Configurable HAP/PII Explainability & Exclusion Controls for OpenScale

The Watson OpenScale HAP and PII Metric Monitor currently lacks transparency and configurability, making it difficult for customers to effectively govern and fine tune content risk in real world use cases. When the HAP and PII metric triggers, there is no visibility into which specific word or phrase caused the violation in a large field of text, leaving governance and operations teams unable to troubleshoot false positives efficiently.

Additionally, OpenScale does not provide a mechanism to exclude or allow specific customer defined terms from HAP and PII evaluation. This limitation is particularly problematic in regulated and domain specific industries such as healthcare, emergency response, and legal services, where industry standard language can mistakenly trigger HAP and PII alerts. For example, a medical chatbot recommending that a patient call 911 immediately can incorrectly trigger a HAP and PII alert due to the string 9 11 (9/11). We have seen the same effect with specific medical terms as well.

This lack of explainability and configurability results in noisy alerts, broken thresholds, and automated notifications that obscure true positives and slow response times. At a minimum, OpenScale should support the ability to view the specific terms or phrases that triggered HAP and PII violations, provide customer configurable exclusion controls for HAP and PII keywords, and offer more granular tuning to support industry specific jargon and workflows. Until these gaps are addressed, the HAP and PII monitor remains of limited value for certain customer use cases, which is disappointing for organizations that have made significant investments in the OpenScale platform.

These enhancements would enable governance teams to accurately assess risk, reduce false positives, and maintain trust in OpenScale automated monitoring and alerting capabilities, especially when reviewing long and complex outputs such as medical documentation where multiple terms could plausibly trigger a violation.

Needed By Yesterday (Let's go already!)