This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Actually we have to use OPL script to attach a relaxation priority to a constraint. It will be easier to attach this priority at the creation of the constraint. Reason is that a constraint tupleset can easily include a priority field:
tuple rvConstraint{
key int Ctn;
float Value;
int Priority;
};
setof(rvConstraint) relProMin = ...;
If I attach the priority at the generation, code would look like this:
forall ( ctn in relProMin )
ctProMin [ctn]:
varPro[< ctn.Ctn >] <= ctn.Valeur : Priority<-ctn.Priority;
Actually we have to create the constraint in OPL:
forall ( ctn in relProMin )
ctProMin [ctn]:
varPro[< ctn.Ctn >] <= ctn.Valeur
Then we attach a priority using OPL script:
var relProMin=OPDSubModel.relPROmin;
for (ctn in relProMin)
{
relaxIterator.attach(ctProMin[ctn],Opl.maxl(ctn.Priorite,0.1));
}
This may seem easy in OPL Script but when I try to do that with the .NET Interface, it's almost impossible due to the difficulty to manipulate dataElement in .NET. Note also that the feasopt call with the interface is not obvious in OPL script but it is worst with the .NET interface. Maybe a major revamp need to be done to this functionality interface in .NET.
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.