This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com
Hi Dev,
Thank you.
On lowercasing the path - as per this Alation article the APIs treat the identifier as case insensitive https://developer.alation.com/dev/docs/lineage-api-faq. My proposal is for us NOT to lowercase the directory names (at least now for the hotfix). If this causes problem, we can revisit this for 42.14. Does this work for you?
Jakub
@jakub,
confirmed the logic. Here it is in pseudocode
```
def canonical_path(sas_lib_path):
res = sas_lib_path.lower().split("/")
return "|".join(res)
```
The test case for canonical_path() is:
canonical_path("/foo/bar") -> "foo|bar"
canonical_path("/foo/bar/") -> "foo|bar"
canonical_path("/FOO/BAR") -> "foo|bar"
Agreed format of the identifier: <alation_source_id>.data|finance.new_table.<Column>, Dev to double-check and confirm today
Apart from that clarification, here is the specification we agreed on (that involves not only what is required in this Aha idea, but also what was discussed over support cases).
Please review and acknowledge the specification. I would also like to kindly ask if you can share the "SAS Program" we can use for verificaiton over email.
Specification of changes in SAS Export to Alation (compared to 42.13 functionality):
Stop exporting SAS and SaS Code Synonyms, these would breake lineage for SAS Tables if exported, as lineage between the Synonym and the Table now cannot be exported because it is a direct link.
Start exporting SAS Tables, stop exporting SAS Code Tables. SAS Code Table are not interesting for end users, we need to focus on SAS Tables instead.
Change asset identifier from
<alation_source_id>.<SAS Library>.<Table>.<Column>to<alation_source_id>.<(SAS) Directories - pipe separated >.<Table>.<Column>(directories can be nested)We need to chain and export all nested directories in the identifier
What should be the separator for directories - pipes. OpenPoint: should there be a leading pipe?
We would use
rootstring if there is no directoryTransformations - export SAS Program instead of individual Statements
As a consequence we would merge lineage for all statements in one dataflow object and thus exporting smaller number of dataflow objects and simplifying lineage in Alation
Side effect:
If the export of artificial loops into Alation is turned off (this will be possible in Manta 42.14), the SAS lineage will be exported only if a SAS Program has both source and target, each of them being either a SAS (not SAS Code) Table, or a Table from another data source (e.g. DB2). On top of that, the Tables need to conform to the general export conditions (they must not be deduced and Alation mapping for them must exist). If these conditions are not met, SAS Program will not be exported.
Hi Dev,
can you please confirm if the leading pipe in "<alation_source_id>.|data|finance|new_table.<Column>" is required? I would expect "<alation_source_id>.data|finance|new_table.<Column>".
Thank you,
Jakub