Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps:

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is:

Status Not under consideration
Workspace Informix
Components Informix Server
Created by Guest
Created on Dec 7, 2017

Archecker table level restore utility does not compatible of handling Informix engine complex table schema clauses

Individual Table restoration 'archecker' utility only support simple schema definition contents as the schema file. However, Informix engine support complex clauses when setting up a table.

E.g. When fragmenting a table based on interval based fragmentation to store each year data in a separate fragment, 'Archecker' table level restoration utility is not intelligent enough to apply the following fragment clause straight away during the table restoration attempt:

Fragment by range( ) Interval(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1,'YEAR')) store in()

Luckily, there is a painful work around solution IBM suggests us to follow-up the steps as follows:

1) Create an additional table level restore (tlr) table with the required schema using the required fragmentation clause.
2) Even if we need to restore on the same dbspace through 'Archecker', setup the 'Archecker' script with the source/target details *without* the fragment/partition details.
3) Execute the normal 'Archecker' command.
4) drop the original table name and rename the tlr table (in step 1) back to the original table name .

This will obviously be a big challenge to any non-DBA person to restore such a table easily and fast manner during an emergency situation. Even for an experience person , it takes considerable time to setup the initial schema file manually as required.

So, the suggestion will be either to extend the 'Archecker' functionality to support such complex table clauses those are support by Informix engine or provide an individual table level restoration functionality through Ontape/OnBar mechanisms to avoid the above complexity to end user.