Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps:

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is:

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on May 8, 2020

IA Data Quality rules Table Join keys operators

Operators - Within IA Data Quality rule development, Currently we can only join tables with = operator on Keys under Joins Tab. There is no way we can join tables using >= or <= operators . For example we would like to join tables where >=, In this scenario, we we have to create SQVT which would be not efficient on time perspective and tool shouldn't be lacking this functionality.

Needed by Date May 8, 2020
    Sep 28, 2020

    Thank you for your idea. All enhancements requests will be considered for IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog moving forward.

  • Guest
    Sep 28, 2020

    I see it has been marked as "Will not implement". Has this Enhancement request been considered for WKC ? Are you considering WKC as totally different standalone Product from Information Server ?

  • Guest
    Sep 28, 2020

    Hello Offering Management Team, Has this been considered for WKC ?

  • Guest
    Sep 28, 2020

    Would it mean, this enhancement request would be considered for Watson Knowledge Catalog.

  • Guest
    Sep 28, 2020

    Will you be considering this request for Watson Knowledge request?