Skip to Main Content
IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



Status Under review
Created by Guest
Created on May 22, 2026

HITL reinforcement learning with both test and production data

Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning could provide significant value in watsonx Orchestrate by helping multi-agent orchestration systems learn preferred behaviors, improve decision paths, and produce more reliable outcomes over time.

This capability could support two primary modes:

1. Admin-Based Evaluation and Training

An administrator could upload a test suite containing real or synthetic inputs. The evaluation framework would then generate the system’s output and provide visibility into the full agentic path taken, including the agents, tools, reasoning steps, and decisions involved.

The administrator could then approve or reject the final output, the agentic path, or both. In more advanced cases, the administrator could visually adjust the path to demonstrate the preferred sequence of agents, tools, or actions the system should have taken for that input. These corrections could then be used to reinforce desired behavior in future runs.

2. User-Feedback-Based Training

A similar workflow could be applied to production feedback. Instead of relying only on a predefined test suite, end-user feedback from production interactions could be routed to an administrator for review.

The administrator could approve, reject, or modify this feedback before allowing it to contribute to the reinforcement learning process. This would allow real-world usage patterns to improve the orchestration system while still maintaining governance and human oversight.

Additional Administrative Controls

Administrators should also have controls to manage and govern the reinforcement learning process, including:

  1. The ability to reset learned behavior and return the system to its baseline configuration, using only the underlying foundation models and existing agent/tool configuration.

  2. The ability to save reinforcement learning selections made against a training dataset, so those selections can be reapplied later if models are changed, environments are reset, or configurations are migrated.

Optional Autonomous Optimization Layer

A more advanced version of this capability could include a separate agentic optimization layer. This layer could initially learn from human-reviewed feedback and, over time, become capable of autonomously identifying and reinforcing preferred orchestration patterns.

However, this should likely remain optional and highly governed, since many enterprise use cases may be too sensitive to allow fully autonomous reinforcement learning without human review.

Idea priority Low