Skip to Main Content
IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



Status Submitted
Workspace Planning Analytics
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 19, 2026

Improve visual contrast for active text formatting controls in PAW Books

Dear team,

Description

When editing text in a Planning Analytics Workspace (PAW) Book, the formatting controls for Bold, Italic, and Underline use different visual states to indicate whether the formatting is currently active or inactive.

Currently, the difference between the active and inactive states is represented mainly through black and dark blue. While the two states are technically distinguishable, the visual contrast is relatively subtle and the active formatting state is not immediately apparent at a glance.

We would like to request an improvement to the visual design of these formatting controls by providing a stronger and more clearly recognizable contrast between active and inactive states.

For comparison, common applications such as Microsoft Excel provide a more pronounced visual indication when a formatting option is active. A similar level of visual feedback in PAW would make the text formatting controls more intuitive and easier to use.

The goal is not necessarily to replicate the Excel design, but to provide a clearer visual distinction so that users can immediately recognize whether Bold, Italic, or Underline is currently active.

This behavior is observed in both Planning Analytics Workspace Local and Planning Analytics Workspace SaaS.

Business / User Impact

The current subtle visual distinction can make it harder for users to immediately identify the active formatting state, particularly when editing text repeatedly.

A stronger visual contrast would:

  • Make the active formatting state easier to recognize.

  • Improve usability and intuitiveness of the text editing experience.

  • Reduce uncertainty when applying or removing formatting.

  • Provide clearer visual feedback for users working with PAW Books.

This is a relatively small UI/UX improvement, but it would make text formatting in PAW more intuitive and consistent with common editing applications.

Thanks in advance.
With best regards,
Vitalij

Needed By Yesterday (Let's go already!)
  • Guest
    Aug 19, 2026

    +1

    We would like to emphasize that this request is primarily a UI/UX improvement rather than a functional change.

    The existing formatting controls already provide a visual distinction between active and inactive states. However, the current contrast is relatively subtle, making it difficult to identify the active state immediately.

    A stronger visual indication would improve usability without changing the underlying functionality. This would be especially helpful for users who frequently work with text formatting in PAW Books.

    We believe this is a relatively small improvement that could provide a noticeable benefit to the overall user experience.