This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com
+1
From a governance and accessibility perspective, I think the user-level selection is a useful extension of the current admin-controlled model.
One point I would add is that the selected theme should ideally be respected consistently across the PAW experience, including books and widgets. If individual books use fixed colors, users may still get inconsistent results when switching between themes.
A semantic color/token approach could help here: administrators could control the available themes and branding, while books use theme-aware values instead of hard-coded colors. This would allow more user flexibility without losing central governance.
+1
One additional aspect I would consider is how the selected PAW theme interacts with existing books.
Allowing users to choose an approved theme is useful, but many dashboards contain explicitly defined background, text, and widget colors. If those remain hard-coded, changing the PAW theme may have little or no effect on the published book.
It would therefore help if book and widget styling could use semantic or theme-aware colors, so the same book can follow the selected PAW theme without a separate light and dark version. That would also make branding and accessibility easier to keep consistent across themes.