Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps:

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is:

Status Submitted
Workspace Planning Analytics
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 21, 2022

SUBNM should validate the input of the arguments

RE: support ticket TS009726346

I am using PAfE version 76. When I use the SUBNM formula:

=SUBNM( "PTR04-BC:Scenario";"";"ACT")

I get the result as ACT.

When I change the case and use the SUBNM formula:

=SUBNM( "PTR04-BC:Scenario";"";"act")

I get the result as act.

Surely only one of them is a valid element in the Scenario dimension, not both.

Even worse, for instance this can occur as well:

=SUBNM( "Correct servername:Sp_Bogus", "", "TEST VALUE THAT DOES NOT EXIST IN DIMENSION")

When the server name is incorrect we get an error. Fine.

However, once the server name is fine, we can enter wrong dimension names, wrong element names...

They all pass and are shown as the result of the SUBNM formula. To me this makes no sense at all. They do not exist in the dimension ! The user / report builder cannot spot issues easily, only through DBRW formulas that point to the cells. Any SUBNM that is not used in DBRW formulas (for instance, to pass element names from one sheet to another) will have errors baked in potentially. An incorrect dimnension name, not existing element names, not existing alias name or subset, these are cases that should be validated when the SUBNM is entered - to avoid issues down the line.

Needed By Quarter