Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


Status Not under consideration
Workspace Spectrum LSF
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 25, 2019

RESERVE value

If "LOCAL_TO=clustername" is set to featurename@clustername, LS merge the reservation to featurename@clustername first.

For example,
could you look at the Use Case?

From the projectgroup vxlxsc_fnd_group, we can see that soc_root and lsi_root are 0.
From the projectgroup vxlxsc_group, we can see that soc_root and lsi_root are 60 11.

In the case, we can see the reserve value even if there is no share value of soc_root and lsi_root from the projectgroup vxlxsc_fnd_group.

And I heard that current LS design does not cover this case. It is decided by LS architecture. When jobs run, LSF reports license reservation data of whole cluster to LS, not for individual job. LS marks RESERVE to vxlxsce@cr1 first due to LOCAL_TO=cr1.

So we'll remove problematic projects which has 0% SHARE from vxlxsc_fnd_group.

However, the customer thinks that it is not correct for RESERVE to be recorded in a project without a share.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 19, 2020

    We have considered this request and it is not something we are able to deliver in the future. If there is broad interest for this, it can be resubmitted in 18 months.