IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps:

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is:

Workspace Spectrum LSF
Components Administration
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 8, 2021

Set the "+pref_level" for hosts or host_groups in lsb.hosts

Currently it's possible in lsb.queues to set the "+pref_level" for hosts or host_groups in the "HOSTS" section to prioritize some hosts for job submission.

We have various host groups defined in lsb.hosts and would like to set the +pref_level for some hostgroups already in lsb. hosts (e.g. in an own hostgroup definition to be further used in lsb.queues for some queues).

For example we have defined in lsb.hosts:

hgroup1 (server1 server2 server3)

hgroup2 (server4 server5 server6)

hgroup_all (hgroup1 hgroup2)

It would be nice to be able to configure something like:

hgroup_all (hgroup1+2 hgroup2)

To be further used in lsb.queues.

Needed By Not sure -- Just thought it was cool
  • Admin
    Bill McMillan
    Dec 14, 2021

    We think that this is a good idea, but at the same time we don't want to break existing behaviour.

    When +preference is specified on the command line, the values are relative to that specific clause, thus "-m grpA+2 grpB+1 grpc" is the same as "-m grpA+500000 grpB+12 grpC+3"

    If we allow +preference to be specified within the group definition, we need to preserve the existing behaviour, for example given the definitions:

    grpA (h1 h2)

    grpB (h3+10 h4)

    grpC (h5+5 h6)

    grpD(grpA+2 grpB+1 grpC)

    "-m grpA+2 grpB+1 grpc" and "-m grpD" need to evaluate the same, and need to be consistent with current behaviour, otherwise many customers will suddenly find hosts in different orders.

    More specifically, irrespective of definitions within grpB, no host within grpB will be more important than those in grpA

    To achieve this, +preference will only be evaluated at the top level, and we will not recursively evaluate individual groups.

    grpD is effectively expanded to "h1+2 h2+2 h3+1 h4+1 h5 h6"