IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

IBM Safer Payments

    Showing 118 of 18241

    In case of wrongly formatted Ipv4

    When a message send with Ipv4 elemnt where the context of it doesn't fulfill the requirement of Ipv4 format, there is no SP response sent back to the source. Instead they get to see only “Error: socket hang up”. It would be perfect if SP would be ...
    about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Under review

    Have different display options for Investigation Reports, specifically the Lead Time so rather than displaying in days we would want to see this in hours

    Currently Lead time shows in days and seeing 0.1 days isn't necessarily useful when we want to know lead time in hours
    about 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

    Special Fraud Index

    We intend to have a special Fraud Index that is updated when a transaction is set as fraudulent. Currently, when we set transactions as fraudulent (using a merge) SaferPayments does not re-compute/insert indexes. We intend to have a new index typ...
    over 5 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

    Separate node for running ML algorithms

    Running ML training on production cluster is pretty challenging. Most often this leads to system crash. The idea is to have a special hardware or VM node that is added to the Safer Payments cluster, but this node to has specific role for only runn...
    over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 1 Submitted

    Store the "Case Close Status" used to close a case within the case instead of reading it from the current Case close table

    The "fraud status" entries in the case history table seems to draw the current fraud status assigned to a case close code and not the one that was valid when the case was actually closed (perhaps it isnt stored at all in the case). So when changin...
    over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Submitted

    Increased functionality of the "Close to" and "Not Close to" operators

    When using the "close to" operators in a condition, would like the ability to specify whether or not the tolerance is only positive or only negative, in addition to the current setting which always works in both a positive and negative direction.
    almost 4 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

    Disabling queries criteria

    Disabling queries criteria Currently When using queries (investigation tab), we add, delete and add a new criteria repetitively to study SP data. Each time we have to search the list of fields name and add the new criteria. Drawback Add and delete...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Under review

    Parameter's list administration feature

    Parameter's list administration feature Currently The threshold of our rules and models are modified individually Drawback Makes it difficult :- to have a picture of the current d state of our parameters,- to monitor the evolutions of our paramete...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Under review

    'Group by' queries criterias

    'Group by' queries criterias Currently The 'Group by' queries of the investigations tab are limited to a unique grouping criteria. Drawback For one of our report , 17 requests 'group by' are needed. Currently , it implies a manual re-union Idea Au...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Under review

    'Group by' queries: end indicator

    'Group by' queries: end indicator Currently When executing a 'group by' queries in the investigation tab, the results are progressively modified until the end of the treatment. Drawback We do not know when the process is complete, which impact the...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Under review

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.