For resizable Jobs,(Optional, as required) we can release resources that are no longer needed. How about add-resources function?For example, I mean like “bresize add”.bresize add "1*hostA 2*hostB hostC" 221 It does seem to help.
Add LSF hostgroups to source list when adding new multiple selection field
When modifying a submission template and adding a new multiple selection field, one of items in the source list should be LSF defined hostgroups. Or a custom script so I can create on to populate the available items.
In PAC if select "Refresh Automatically" is toggled, the WEBGUI halts and becomes unusable if refresh is launched while the user at the same time is performing actions on jobs.
Gain Visibility into ProjectGroup section in lsf.licensescheduler.
Here is some projectgroup section in lsf.licensescheduler. Begin ProjectGroupGROUP SHARES OWNERSHIP LIMITS NON_SHARED(xxxxx_group(soc_root ssir lsi infra foundry short mem default)) (56 18 10 5 6 2 2 1) (- - - - - 85 - -) () (200 50 - - - 85 - -)(...
Redesign job details/spooler section to provide correct and adequate information
The purpose of the Job Details/Summary section is to provide the user with adequate information on the selection jobs from the list. This means to provide the same information that the Linux users get with "bjobs -l" and more! However, the current...
The meaning of pending reason related to License Scheduler is not clear.It will be treated as only one pending reason. For example, we can often see the pending reason as follows. PENDING REASONS:Job's requirements for reserving resource (xxxxxxx)...
Samsung request blimits can display the limit even there is no any running job on this limit. For the blimits command, it does not display if there is no any running job on this limit.
When using project group, the ownership can only be set to leaf node(i.e., the project), but cannot be set to a group. Samsung want to define SHARES for each project, define OWNERSHIP for group, and don't want to define OWNERSHIP for each project.