IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

Operational

Showing 52 of 15641

Provide a method to forcibly kick users from an instance

If the primary instance or any instance a user is logged into needs to be restarted or shutdown for either maintenance or technical issues this could help provide notification to the logged in users.
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Increased functionality of the "Close to" and "Not Close to" operators

When using the "close to" operators in a condition, would like the ability to specify whether or not the tolerance is only positive or only negative, in addition to the current setting which always works in both a positive and negative direction.
almost 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Allow rules to add entries to risk lists with dynamic filter criteria

When an entry is added to a risk list via a rule, filter criteria defined as part of the risk list is static. For example, if an account number is added to a risk list which has filter criteria defined as "Merchant State equal to [Destination Stat...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Create error message or revert back to SS home page when a user is not configured in Guardian.

When a user has SS access, but is not configured in SP, the SP log in screen displays. The user will attempt to log in here and will not be able to continue- this can be very confusing and cause phone calls to our support team. We need either an e...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Separate the Intercepted by existing rules row within rule generation.

We identified in May that the “Intercepted by existing rules” row within the rule generator does not appear to be functioning correctly. Rather than providing stats surrounding transactions which were intercepted by the model revision, it actually...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Schedule to run a rule over a certain period of time

We are looking for a way within Safer Payments to batch rules over historic transactions. We basically want to schedule to run a rule over a certain period of time. Essentially we are looking for rules that do not trigger as transactions come in, ...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Field translation issues

Previously in some fields (MCC for example) we would only see the MCC in field hovering over would give us the explanation. Now all within text box (Problem due to what now was 4 digit column has to be a sentence, meaning less overall data on scre...
about 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Not under consideration

Improve quality and trackability of (outgoing) HTTP system log error messages

Currently it is difficult to track a failed http message back to a case, because there are no shared ID between those logs. Best option you have is using the timestamps. Please provide an option to put a HTTP Message ID used in the System Log in t...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Not under consideration

In attribute field choices, Shift the standard expressions to the bottom of the list

There are standard expressions ([] , ValueA ~ValueB, Exp) used in rule writing that are displayed in the field dropdown. These appear first and your customer's field values are last. It should be reversed- field values first, expressions second. E...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Resuming support for duplet detection and not storing identical sequence values

In Safer Payments 6.3.0.01 it seems that duplet detection and the option for not storing identical sequence values for indexes are still not present. In the index create/edit page the "store entries with identical sequence values" checkbox is not ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.