IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 79 of 18241

    Enhance lsmake4 to support Grouped Target's in the latest version of make 4.4.1

    Currently our tools are using Grouped Target's which don't properly work causing quite a bit of rework after the initial compile.
    almost 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0 Planned for future release

    for loadSched memory if the submitted job has memory reservation the job should not be run if the nodes mem used + job memory reservation > loadSched memory limit

    because users want to keep a certain amount of memory free. And currently the limit can be bypassed.
    about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0 Future consideration

    LSF connector error while configuring K8s

    kubectl create -f $LSF_BINDIR/../../misc/kubernetes/parallelJob-v1alpha1.yaml > /tmp/IBM/parallelJob-v1alpha1.yaml.log error: resource mapping not found for name: "paralleljobs.ibm.com" namespace: "" from "/home/shared/lsfhome/10.1/linux3.10-...
    about 3 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 1 Future consideration

    Allow resource limit ELIGIBLE_PEND_JOBS usage for APPS

    I would like to have a limit ELIGIBLE_PEND_JOBS for the consumer APPS. The reason is an application which needs licenses from a license server. In case of many simultanously dispatched jobs the license server overloads. Up to now the resource limi...
    about 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 3 Not under consideration

    tool to list out active and default base params - lsparams

    Think of 'bparams' and the level of details that it provides with args '-la'. This helps in figuring out what all params are configured as default or what defaults values are affecting the scheduling. Such a tool does not exist for LSF Base config...
    about 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0 Planned for future release

    Effective r15s/r1m/r15m values for job reservations

    When using run queue length indices in rusage strings, there should be an option to have the value divided by ncpus. Since in the "total load used for scheduling" the r15s/r1m/r15m are taken from lsload -E and divided by the specific ncpus for tha...
    about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 2 Not under consideration

    lsfproxyd - Persistent blocking rules

    LSFProxyd is a new solution to help scheduler handle queries effectively. This RFE is to enable persistent blocksing rules for heavy query hitters. Same has been discussed with John Welch in a separate discussion.
    over 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 1 Future consideration

    Keep job in memory for a specified time period

    Allow job to be kept in memory for an extended amount of time beyond global setting
    about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0 Planned for future release

    command-level job starters should work with bsub

    According to https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/spectrum-lsf/10.1.0?topic=starters-about-job command-level job starters (using LSF_JOB_STARTER env variable) do not work Are user-defined. They run interactive jobs submitted using lsrun, lsgrun, or ch. Com...
    about 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 5 Is a defect

    LSF job query filter on pending jobs without providing pending reasons

    For large LSF clusters, the bjobs command takes significant time to gather the pending reasons (-p, -pei, -pe, -pi) making the query much longer than requesting all jobs. Suggest a new bjobs option to filter on pending jobs without supplying the p...
    over 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Scheduling 0

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.