IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 135 of 15535

Consolidated alarm in Index Based Evaluation cases should show the timestamp of the aggregated hits and also the IBE name that triggered the hit

Right now it only shows the index value and the score and investigator has no way of knowing when the hits were aggregated. So if in a case there are multiple hits consolidated the investigator has no way of knowing which hit was aggregated at wha...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Not under consideration

Keeping the case numbering for each SP instance after restart or restore

as-is: If all cases that generated on low active SP instance was archived, and then the SP instance restarts, the case id for cases generated on this SP instance starts from 1. Archived cases might be used for investigation and that would be help...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Future consideration

Connexion/authentification to SP with SSO SAMLV2 or OIDC

Hello, In our company, user rights are managed using an IAM which allows central management of access authorizations. The current implementation of SP doesn't allow us to use our authentication server and our IAM as it doesn't provide SSO capabi...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Working queue- change functionality offers too much capability

As an External Admin User with working queue-change privileges, I can do more than just add the user to the queue. I can change Insertion Conditions when these are preset by Network and should not be changed. The change feature should break ou...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Future consideration

In attribute field choices, Shift the standard expressions to the bottom of the list

There are standard expressions ([] , ValueA ~ValueB, Exp) used in rule writing that are displayed in the field dropdown. These appear first and your customer's field values are last. It should be reversed- field values first, expressions second. E...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Resuming support for duplet detection and not storing identical sequence values

In Safer Payments 6.3.0.01 it seems that duplet detection and the option for not storing identical sequence values for indexes are still not present. In the index create/edit page the "store entries with identical sequence values" checkbox is not ...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Not under consideration

Adding Statistical Metric to Computation Methods

Currently, the computation methods available within SP for profiling attributes is limited. For example, for calendar profiles all that is available is: average amount, frequency, total amount . Standard Deviation is available for this category of...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Future consideration

External user drop-down menu has Users from Head mandator

Workaround was to remove investigate and inherit sub from internal tech users but it still displays for business users. Critical for go live
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

New AML Type/AML Timestamp field (Duplicate of SP Fraud Type/Timestamp)

A field similar to SP Fraud type/SP Fraud Timestamp is needed for AML marking purposes We have had cases where we would need to mark a transaction as both fraud and an AML type This would have the same function as SP fraud type/timestamp field as ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Not under consideration

Automatically filter rules table when the "Open Rules Table" option is selected

Within the Model Components screen, the user has the option to check a particular component and select "Open Rules Table". When that option is selected, the user is redirected to the Rules screen for a view of all rules, regardless of model compon...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.