IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

Financial Transaction Manager

Showing 318 of 15643

CPA005 Transaction Rejected in FTM Base but Accepted by Gateway in PFS layer (Refer WorkItem Work Item 114946)

During AFT application development, we found that FTM Base rejected transactions where getting accepted by Gateway in PFS i.e. FTM Base Rejections are not considered by Gateway for updating a payment's status. We raised a RTC defect 114946 for thi...
almost 4 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Canadian Payments Association (CPA) 2 Not under consideration

Extending mapper support to GPA messages

FTM Base doesn't support GPA messages. When we receive GPA MT081 messages they have status Transmission Mapping failed.
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Base 0 Not under consideration

Enhance logging to include any user access to specific items during review, repair and dup review.

any time a user accesses an item for review, repair or duplicate detect we have a need to have this logged and a record of what item was accessed.
10 months ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Check 0 Under review

Message WareHouse Power Search of SWIFT Messages (MT and MX)

Currently COGNOS is used to query MT and MX messages. For MT there is a free text search, but the same is not made available for MX messages. In addition, general query performance is slow. Note that I have look at other SWIFT products, and they a...
over 5 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 2 Not under consideration

Monitor and suggest Gateway Threads

FTM for Digital Payments should offer ways to monitor Gateway Threads and indicate optimal thread values.
10 months ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Under review

Automatically scale gateway threads

FTM for Digital Payments should be able to automatically scale Gateway threads to achieve optimal performance based on load.
10 months ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Under review

Extracting and Presenting values from ISO20022 msgs in FTM MER screens

Idea details Extracting and Presenting values from ISO20022 msgs in FTM MER screens We are suggesting that the value from certain fields in ISO20022 messages pacs.002 and pacs.008 are extracted and presented in MER screens. Purpose is to in...
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 3 Future consideration

During Credit Transfer Segment threshold check when using CT API, a negative acknowledgement (pacs002) should be generated and sent to the sender.

During Credit Transfer Segment threshold check when using MQ channel, a negative acknowledgement (pacs002) is generated and sent tothe sender. When we use CT API in the same flow, a negative acknowledgement (pacs002) is not generated.
10 months ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / FTM Common Services 0 Under review

T2 domain in MER Facility for manual entry of T2 MSGs

MER Facility manual data entry for T2 MSGs would be much easier if there was a T2 domain like there is for CBPR+ or remit solutions , Proxy voting MX MSGs This would help data entry users to verify the fields and the whole MSGs according to ECB ru...
over 3 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 0 Not under consideration

pacs and camt message <AppHdr>

Currently the Business Application Header or the <AppHdr> elements for ISO 20022 pacs and camt messages are not displayed in both Formatted and Unformatted screen in FTM MER. This <AppHdr> contains information that is useful for SWIFT ...
over 1 year ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.