This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
When a Lock-Escalation occurs it is documented by message DSNI031I (Lock Escalation has occurred) in the Db2-Master-Adressspace. But when a Lock-Escalation fails there is no documentation for this, instead it comes to a Timeout or Deadlock from a lock-change-request with Resource-Type 00000210 (Partition) and Resource-Name is the Tablespace-Partition that looks like this:
01.34.22 S0103665 DSNT375I <DBR2 PLAN=DISTSERV WITH 492
492 CORRELATION-ID=db2jcc_appli
492 CONNECTION-ID=SERVER
492 LUW-ID=G4EF5B19.MC1C.DC7B58B5C42B=57458
492
492 THREAD-INFO=Q100494:OSPE_LOCALHOST_6:421_Q100107:aspm.REORG_DATA:STAT
492 IC:259376357:*:<::4.239.91.25.22776.DC7B568542C9>
492 IS DEADLOCKED WITH PLAN=GK000421 WITH
492 CORRELATION-ID=POOLP98W0007
492 CONNECTION-ID=PRCICD0Z
492 LUW-ID=DESIKVE0.PRDBR300.DC7B58C47F53=23017
492 THREAD-INFO=Q100002:*:*:POOLP98W:STATIC:259466942:*:*
492 ON MEMBER DBR3
01.34.22 S0103665 DSNT501I <DBR2 DSNILMCL RESOURCE UNAVAILABLE 493
493 CORRELATION-ID=db2jcc_appli
493 CONNECTION-ID=SERVER
493 LUW-ID=G4EF5B19.MC1C.DC7B58B5C42B=57458
493 REASON 00C90088
493 TYPE 00000210
493 NAME MK400421.TSMK4000.00000001
The SQL ends with SQL-Code -911/-913 (Timeout or Deadlock), which means for many developers that they have a concurrency-problem with other applications, but they don’t see that the reason for this problem comes from too many changes within a single unit of work which leads to a lock-escalation. In the case above the application gets:
DSNT408I SQLCODE = -913, ERROR: UNSUCCESSFUL EXECUTION CAUSED BY
DEADLOCK OR TIMEOUT. REASON CODE 00C90088, TYPE OF RESOURCE
00000210, AND RESOURCE NAME MK400421.TSMK4000.00000001
DSNT418I SQLSTATE = 57033 SQLSTATE RETURN CODE
DSNT415I SQLERRP = DSNXRRC SQL PROCEDURE DETECTING ERROR
DSNT416I SQLERRD = 112 13172746 13172872 13226962 -975040510
536870912 SQL DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION
DSNT416I SQLERRD = X'00000070' X'00C9000A' X'00C90088' X'00C9D3D2'
X'C5E21002' X'20000000' SQL DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION
Suggestion: In case of an unsuccessful Lock-Escalation please return an SQL-Code -904, instead of -911/-913, with a Reason-Code that shows that this is a failed Lock-Escalation and return the Tablespace-Name in the message-text.
Alternativly if you don't want to change the SQL-Code, please return a Reason-Code that shows the failed Lock-Escalation.
Needed By | Not sure -- Just thought it was cool |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Please ignore the brief state change to 'in development' - that was applied to this idea in errror. State has been moved back to 'future consideration'. Sorry for any confusion this may have caused.
Dear Rolf, Thank you for submitting this enhancement request. Our Db2 for z/OS development team reviewed it and agree this would be useful. However, because our current 12 month roadmap is already completely booked, we cannot include it at this time. We have placed it in Future consideration and tagged it to re-review when planning for the content for the next upcoming roadmap(s) begin.
We appreciate your input to the Db2 for z/OS development team. And we hope that you will continue to submit enhancement suggestions for improvements as customer feedback is a key component to shaping the future direction of Db2 for z/OS.
Sincerely,
Db2 for z/OS Team