This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com
Hi Paulo, Thank you for the quick reply! I will share your feedback with Frank.
Hi Janet,
Thanks for the answer.
Actually we set an automation upon CDC message CHC9210E when reason code is 00E60831. If this happens,we issue a -DIS TRACE command to reenable monitor traces and IFI requests. But we depend on CDC to be active, which, OK, happens most of the time. But sometimes effect of monitor traces and IFI being stopped is commands failing in tools like DB2 Admin Tool, which is not so easy to capture and automate.
Then we tought an automation based on a DB2 message would be more effective.
Regards,
Paulo R Petrachini
Hi Paulo,
Thanks for the question.
Frank from our Db2 for z/OS develoment team looked through our history on sending a message out when the monitor traces stopped and it looks like we purposefully don't write a message because we rely on the subsequent incoming IFI request to be the notification as the facility will set IFCARC1 = IFCC0008 and IFCARC2 = IFCC0831.
This is the current direction. Is there a reason not to check and automate upon this action?
Thanks!
Frank from Db2 for z/OS development
Hi, Janet.
Thanks for the last update.
Is it possible to issue a DB2 message when IFI requests and MONITOR trace are disabled so that we can monitor it and create a homemade automation to issue a -DISPLAY TRACE and resume IFI processing ?
Thanks,
Paulo R Petrachini
Hello Paulo, Our Db2 for z/OS development team reviewed your update and provided the following feedback:
The difference between the AEXITLIM zparm and adding one for IFI requests is that the auth exit abends would be preventing a system issue outside of Db2 and thus changing the threshold would be up to the system operators discretion and would require a db2 restart after the fix to the exit is corrected.
Disabling IFI processing is a safety measure for abend occurring inside Db2 of incoming applications. Therefore, Db2 is trying to protect itself until the application has been corrected.
Sincerely,
The Db2 for z/OS Team
Thank you for your update, Paulo. I have shared it with our Db2 development team and asked that they take your additional feedback in to consideration when re-reviewing this idea as a potential candidate for delivery at a later date.
Sincerely,
The Db2 for z/OS Team
Dear Janet, thank you for answering to my enhancement request. I asked this enhancement because I thought it would be something similar to zPARM AEXITLIM, which controls how many abends can occur in DSNX@XAC befor it stops running. I thought implementation for MONITOR trace processing would be similar. But Ok for me if development team see risks in implementing this customer override.
A DISPLAY command seems to me a good idea, especially if in this DISPLAY I could see hard-coded threshold value and number of abends at the moment of DISPLAY, to know how far we are from stopping MONITOR trace processing.
Regards,
Paulo R Petrachini
Dear Paulo, Thank you for submitting this enhancement request. Our Db2 for z/OS development team reviewed it and provided the following feedback:
Allowing a customer override of the default/hard-coded abend count is a safety measure as almost all abends through MONITOR trace processing occurs on the customer/vendor applications. This is a fail-safe for Db2 trace facility.
As a stop gap, would it be ameanable if Db2 provides the current value through either a DISPLAY command or passed back in the IFCA? This would be less disruptive to customer systems.
We would like to hear your feedback. Also, please note that, due to other items already scheduled for our next 12 month delivery, we cannot address this item in the near future. We are placing it in Not under consideration but will review your response, and will re-review this request again when the next roadmap discussions begin.
Sincerely,
The Db2 for z/OS Team