Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The product management team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Additional Information

To view our roadmaps:

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

IBM Employees:

The correct URL for entering your ideas is:

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 12, 2020

Allow Owner and Giver to reside in different CIFs

Sample scenarios:

  1. An adult (parent, guardian) provides consent on behalf of a child. The child is a client, the adult is not.

  2. A company officer provides consent on behalf of an organization

For both scenarios the following five cases are material:

  1. Both consent owner and consent giver are managed by MDM (currently supported)

  2. Both consent owner and consent giver are managed by the same system outside of MDM (currently supported)

  3. Consent owner is managed by MDM, but consent giver is managed in a CIF outside MDM (not currently supported)

  4. Consent giver is managed by MDM, but consent owner is managed in a CIF outside MDM (not currently supported)

  5. Consent owner and consent giver are managed in different CIFS outside MDM

Scenario 1) is very conceivable, especially if the adult is a guardian or a representative of the state - they may well do their banking elsewhere.

For scenario 2), given organizations can't speak or act independently, there will always be a human consent giver different from the consent owner, and the legal requirements to capture the identity of the giver are not difficult to extrapolate. In the specific case of RBC, for this scenario, consent owner would be managed by MDM, but consent giver would be managed outside MDM

Needed by Date Aug 1, 2021
  • Admin
    MAY LI
    Apr 12, 2021

    Hi Ron,

    Given our priority for IBM Match 360 on Cloud Pak for Data, we cannot guarantee that this RFE will happen in 2021.

    Thank You for your understanding

  • Admin
    MAY LI
    Aug 13, 2020

    Hi Ron, we should have a better view of the timeline and priorities next week.

  • Admin
    MAY LI
    Aug 12, 2020

    Thank you - Ron - for the submission. We will investigate and follow up here with status.