This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com
My query could be for a specific relation - entity combo from my custom model:
(enriched_text.relations:(type::"Related_Costs",arguments.entities.type:"FIXED_ASSETS"))
My query currently returns these highlights,
"highlight": {
"enriched_text.relations.arguments.entities.type": [
"<em>FIXED_ASSETS</em>"
],
"enriched_text.relations.type.raw": [
"<em>Related_Costs</em>"
],
"enriched_text.entities.type": [
"<em>FIXED_ASSETS</em>"
]
}
(which actually is wrong because i did not ask to match on enriched_text.entities.type::"FIXED_ASSETS" but only
enriched_text.relations.arguments.entities.type::"FIXED_ASSETS")
However, I should be getting back the evidence where it matched, I should get back something like this which would be somewhat the equivalent of getting back the sentence for a keyword match with the term highlighted.:
"highlight": {
"enriched_text.relations.type.raw": [
{
"type": "Related_Costs",
"sentence": "The recoverable Extra Expense loss is the reasonable and necessary extra costs incurred by the Insured for the following during the PERIOD OF LIABILITY: (1) Extra expenses to temporarily continue as nearly normal as practicable the conduct of the Insured's business; and (2) Extra costs of temporarily using property or facilities of the Insured or others; less any value remaining at the end of the PERIOD OF LIABILITY of property obtained in connection with sub -paragraph (1) or (2) above.",
"score": 0.5205,
"arguments": [
{
"text": "property",
"location": [
34941,
34949
],
"entities": [
{
"type": "FIXED_ASSETS",
"text": "property",
"disambiguation": {
"subtype": [
"NONE"
]
}
}
]
},
{
"text": "costs",
"location": [
34914,
34919
],
"entities": [
{
"type": "COSTS",
"text": "costs",
"disambiguation": {
"subtype": [
"NONE"
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
Or at least I should get back relation.sentence for a relation match:
"highlight": {
"enriched_text.relations.type.raw": [
{
"type": "Related_Costs",
"sentence": "The recoverable Extra Expense loss is the reasonable and necessary extra costs incurred by the Insured for the following during the PERIOD OF LIABILITY: (1) Extra expenses to temporarily continue as nearly normal as practicable the conduct of the Insured's business; and (2) Extra costs of temporarily using property or facilities of the Insured or others; less any value remaining at the end of the PERIOD OF LIABILITY of property obtained in connection with sub -paragraph (1) or (2) above.",
and for an entity match I would expect
{
"count": 1,
"text": "Equipment",
"confidence": 0.768784,
"mentions": [
{
"sentence_location": [
0,
299
],
"location": [
130,
139
],
"text": "Equipment",
"mention_type": "none",
"confidence": 0.768784
}
],
"type": "FIXED_ASSETS",
"disambiguation": {
"subtype": [
"NONE"
]
}
or at least matching entity text
{
"count": 1,
"text": "Equipment",
"confidence": 0.768784,
"type": "FIXED_ASSETS",
"disambiguation": {
"subtype": [
"NONE"
]
}
Let me know if this example makes sense Phil.
Can you provide an example of the query that is returning this? It seems like it would mainly be an issue if a bunch of different queries were ORed, or a substring search was performed (otherwise you'd know which enrichment matched as you searched for it)
This is critical for clients who develop their own custom model to annotate domain knowledge and then retrieve documents for domain insights. The current highlight returns only entity and relation type but to show the EVIDENCE of why a particular document matched, i.e. show the actual relation.sentence or entity.text requires returning all enrichments and searching for the exact enrichment that matched. This is a huge gap for Project Daisey where we need to cache enrichments in an external store for faster retrieval.