This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com
Hello
I want to make it more clear.
You think that this is an enhancement for DB2.
But it is not an enhancement, it is a bug. A real big bug.
A lot of IBM managers and also IBM developers agreed to me that this is a bug.
And untill now I thought that IBM is interested to fix bugs as soon as possible.
But now I hear that it will be under future consideration.
I think you realy should rethink this decision.
If you have any aditional questions, don���t hesitate to contact me.
Thanks in advance, and I hope to get an positive feedback on this mail.
Manfred WAGNER
Statistik Austria
Von: IBM (Shruthi Subbaiah Machimada) [mailto:22e6f8ded7c51a6345005542-bigblue@iad-prod1.mailer.aha.io]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. April 2020 19:46
An: WAGNER Manfred
Betreff: Nickname using session_user status has changed to Future Consideration
Hello Karthik
Simple SELECT Statements do not work as expected.
So if I connect to the database with an CONNECT-USER which have only the permission for CONNECT and SETSESSIONUSER and no other permission.
After the SET SESSION_USER Statement to an so called SESSION-USER which has SELECT permission for an Nickname
I get an Error-Message that the CONNECT-USER doesn't have the Permission to SELECT from the Nickname.
The USER-MAPPING is set so I have an mapping between the SESSION-USER and the REMOTE-USER
So the SESSION-USER has SELECT permission to the NICKNAME and there is a USER-MAPPING between SESSION-USER and REMOTE-USER and I still get the Error-Message that the CONNECT-USER doesn't have SELECT permission.
If I give the CONNECT-USER the SELECT permission and create an USER-MAPPING to the REMOTE-USER then it works. This Shows me that the Nickname doesn't look for the permissions of the SESSION-USER it Looks just for the permissions of the CONNECT-USER
Hi Manfred,
Thanks for your idea related to Db2 LUW.
Could you please clarify which statement using nicknames that is not behaving as expected?
Thanks,
Karthik Gopalakrishnan
Offering Manager, IBM Db2