Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

Technical

Showing 32

New API operation for fraud marking a record in the whole cluster

The existing markFraud API operation receives as an input a URID that is specific of the API instance that will process this operation. This creates a possible information gap if the API instance that will process this operation is different from ...
8 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Have the ability to export the "Audit Trail" and "Compare Revision" features in the Revision Control tab.

Clients can have the ability to export that information outside of the tool for documentation purposes.
12 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Allow batch export on non-BDI-enabled Instances

There are many occasions when a review of the data is required to troubleshoot, verify, or perform general research. Due to the way that Safer Payments replicates transaction activity there are many situations when the data will be different, so i...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Allow Investigation on non-API-enabled Instances

There are many occasions when a review of the data is required to troubleshoot, verify, or perform general research. Due to the way that Safer Payments replicates transaction activity there are many situations when the data will be different, so i...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Add PMML support for function: invalidValueTreatment (better support for categories)

Safer Payments supports a subset of pmml function. We recently encountered an issue where one function > invalidValueTreatment < was not supported. This is epspecially helpful when working with categories in the training data, which should b...
3 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Safer Payments should activate the key generated on KMIP server instead of manually activating the key on KMIP server.

We have to activate key created on KMIP servers manually each time before we can actually activate master key change. KMIP standard says it has to be managed by application. Need Safer Payments to activate the key before starting the master key ch...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Not under consideration

Safer Payments should support more than one KMIP server defined for each key.

Need Safer Payments to have more than one KMIP server defined for each key for higher availability.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Not under consideration

HTTPv1 and HTTPv2 coverage in Outgoing Channels

Currently, the HTTP outgoing channel comply with version 1.0 of the http protocol. This is an obsolete version of it and modern versions must be covered as it can crash with customers architectural standards. For example: http "Host" header is not...
8 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Separate timeouts for OTP and User Sessions

In our last Pen Test, we identified a concern with the current configuration of security timeouts. Specifically, the system is using the same timeout value for both the user session and the login OTP validity. We believe these should be separate s...
3 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Ability to restrict usage of an attribute defined at upper level mandator in lower level mandators in the mandator hierarchy

Currently client users can use all the attributes defined on the root mandator on rules and investigation queries . Certain attributes are defined at the root level are purely internal and we want to restrict the visibility and usage of this attri...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted