IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 144 of 15763

Ability to have online messages to detail why go-lives are in queue and pending processing.

Product and Tech support teams would have more visibility with understanding why a go-live is in queue. Specifically, support staff would be able to differentiate deadlock vs BAU processing situations. This would assist staff with determining if a...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Future consideration

Safer Payments should activate the key generated on KMIP server instead of manually activating the key on KMIP server.

We have to activate key created on KMIP servers manually each time before we can actually activate master key change. KMIP standard says it has to be managed by application. Need Safer Payments to activate the key before starting the master key ch...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Not under consideration

Multi challenger simulation

Multi challenger simulation Currently When simulating data we are limited to the current challenger and the champions of the other mandators levels of the hierarchical structure. When we modify a variable on Mandator0 , we can't simulate the impac...
5 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Go-Live Security regarding simulation hazards

Go-Live Security regarding simulation hazards Currently When we launch a Go live on a challenger meanwhile having a simulation ongoing we encountered instance crash.Knowing this, before each go live, we check the existence of ongoing simulation in...
5 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Hide model components from users authorized only to use lower mandators

In large customers such as payment providers and banks usually setups go by multichannel -> channel -> department/customer. These institutions often want to have their centralized sets of rules and profiles that check the transactions indepe...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Submitted

Safer Payments should support more than one KMIP server defined for each key.

Need Safer Payments to have more than one KMIP server defined for each key for higher availability.
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Not under consideration

Index data lost after the deployment

Hello IBM Safer payment experts, Recently we caused operational impact with false positive by wiping out few indexes in production. Root cause analysis: Few Indexes were reset on 10/26 due to starting a configuration with a capacity being lower th...
3 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Restrict Access to columns/attributes based on role

Allow admins to determine which attributes a user has access to view in queries and within a case. This could be handled at the role level. Not all users need access to the same type of data; limiting which users can see each attribute helps infor...
about 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Planned for future release

Masked Data Customization

Allow more customization around which users can view the values of each encrypted attribute. This is currently handled at the user account level and a user may either view all encrypted/masked values or none of them. We need additional flexibility...
over 3 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Text Risk List Entries Having Option for Case Sensitive/Ignore Cases

We have clients who import attributes that are stored as text (Merchant Name) into their risk lists and the file they are importing comes through as all capital letters due to how their internal database stores the data. In order to account for th...
6 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.