IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers
Hide about this portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 71

Ability to restrict usage of an attribute defined at upper level mandator in lower level mandators in the mandator hierarchy

Currently client users can use all the attributes defined on the root mandator on rules and investigation queries . Certain attributes are defined at the root level are purely internal and we want to restrict the visibility and usage of this attri...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

In case of wrongly formatted Ipv4

When a message send with Ipv4 elemnt where the context of it doesn't fulfill the requirement of Ipv4 format, there is no SP response sent back to the source. Instead they get to see only “Error: socket hang up”. It would be perfect if SP would be ...
4 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

HTTPv1 and HTTPv2 coverage in Outgoing Channels

Currently, the HTTP outgoing channel comply with version 1.0 of the http protocol. This is an obsolete version of it and modern versions must be covered as it can crash with customers architectural standards. For example: http "Host" header is not...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Extract or export kpi/sai dashboard information from Safer Payments

Using the Dashboard we can see and track some information related to MCI latency (average, maximum, violation ...), transactions message rate, FLI buffer usage ... but existing display makes things complicated to track them on monthly basis and ge...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Unmark button for - with fraud or genuine marked - transactions

We are using IBM Safer Payments 6.5.0.02 It should be possible to undo markings that have been set incorrectly by mistake. Today you can only replace one marker with another (Genuine <-> Fraud). The context menu should offer an unmark function.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Index data lost after the deployment

Hello IBM Safer payment experts, Recently we caused operational impact with false positive by wiping out few indexes in production. Root cause analysis: Few Indexes were reset on 10/26 due to starting a configuration with a capacity being lower th...
5 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Add Group By query type to Simulation queries.

Ad hoc and other similar queries available for Simulation data are limited to a configurable number of records allowed. As a result, it is not always possible to get back all of the data of interest in a single Simulation query while also maintain...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Provide out-of-the-box Prometheus Exporters which invoke Safer Payments APIs and convert to a Prometheus format required by external Monitoring Solutions

Each client needs to integrate Safer Payments with their external Monitoring Solution. In the case of the Federal Reserve the monitoring solution is Grafana. The following are standard Safer Payments APIs that on many projects need to be integrate...
11 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Allow inclusion of sub-mandator model(s) in upper-mandator simulations.

For those using a multi-mandator structure, it is currently possible to include model components from an upper-mandator when running a simulation on the sub-mandator due to the inheritance feature. However, it is not possible to do the opposite: i...
12 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Allow for all Action Usage at Merge

It would be beneficial is we could update more than just inputs at the time of Merge. Having the ability to reference all possible actions would provide more flexibility and allow for quicker usage of data. There are payloads that along with updat...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Submitted

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.